Legal Opinion
State v. Mirquet
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided December 30, 1992No. 920066-CAPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILLINGS, Associate Presiding Judge:
The State of Utah appeals the trial court’s grant of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. The trial court granted the motion based on the State’s failure to provide the constitutional protections required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). We affirm.
FACTS
On November 25, 1989, defendant was driving south on Interstate 15 in his 1978 Cadillac. Officer Paul Mangelson of the Utah Highway Patrol was operating a radar speed check near Nephi. He clocked defendant’s speed at 76 m.p.h. in a 65 m.p.h. zone. Officer…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Arturo Gonzalez-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WoodUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MirquetUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Kunzler v. O'DELLCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.