Legal Opinion

Deere v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 12, 1997No. CA CR 96-1421PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John F. Stroud, Jr., Judge.

On September 9, 1994, appellant, Carlos Deere, entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charge of theft by receiving. The court suspended imposition of sentence for five years. During that period, appellant was to comply with several conditions of suspension, including the conditions that he was not to commit any offenses punishable by imprisonment; he was not to possess any weapons; and he was not to use, possess, sell, carry, or otherwise handle any controlled substances without a valid doctor’s prescription. On February 17, 1996, a warrant was executed to search…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Duty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Neble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Billings v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Allen v. RoutonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitmore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Smith v. HudginsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Harris v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API