Legal Opinion

McLendon v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 6, 1994PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellant moved to dismiss this action alleging it was barred by the statute of limitations. The trial judge denied the motion and this appeal follows.

Respondent now moves to dismiss this appeal asserting the order denying the motion to dismiss is not immediately ap-pealable. Appellant argues the order is immediately appeal-able because the running of the statute of limitations deprives the circuit court of subject matter jurisdiction.

“Subject matter jurisdiction is ‘the power to hear and determine cases of the general class to which the proceedings in question belong.’ [citation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Ballenger v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Mende v. Conway Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Glenn v. School District No. Five of Anderson CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Moyd v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of Ina Ruth BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Huntley v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. City of North Myrtle Beach v. Lewis-DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Rwe Nukem Corp. v. Ensr Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Simpson Ex Rel. Estate of Demos v. Sanders Ex Rel. Estate of DemosSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API