Legal Opinion
Estate of Sauceda v. City of North Las Vegas
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided March 30, 2019No. Case No.: 2:11-cv-02116-GMN-NJKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
Pending before the Court is the Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 140), filed by the City of North Las Vegas ("North Las Vegas"), the North Las Vegas Police Department ("NLVPD"), and Officer Jeffrey Pollard ("Pollard") (collectively "Defendants"). Plaintiffs the Estate of Fernando Sauceda, Irene Sauceda, and their minor children (collectively "Plaintiffs") filed a Response, (ECF No. 141), and Defendants filed a Reply, (ECF No. 146).
For the reasons discussed herein, Defendants' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Summary
T…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alvin Ramirez v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Manriquez v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Roberts v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019