Marriage of Rundell v. Rundell
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment and marriage dissolution decree. The appellant contends the district court abused its discretion in dividing the parties’ property and asserts the court’s awards for spousal maintenance and attorney fees are inadequate. We affirm but remand for further consideration.
FACTS
Appellant Wayne Rundell and respondent Mary Rundell were married in May 1971. There are no children from this marriage. Wayne was approximately fifty-one years old at the time of the marriage and had been a teacher and principal for several years. He retired from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- In Re the Marriage of O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Rohling v. RohlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Dahlberg v. DahlbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Stevens v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carlson v. Moratzka (In Re Carlson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- In RE MARRIAGE OF FITZGERALD v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Coalee Breanna Carlson v. Timothy D. MoratzkaUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2008