Legal Opinion

Merneigh v. Merneigh

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 3, 1954No. Gen. 46,202PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Schwartz

delivered the opinion of the court.

The principal question presented to us by this appeal is whether or not a proceeding for divorce may be prosecuted while the defendant is insane, if the grounds for the divorce existed before the time of the defendant’s insanity. The trial judge discontinued the proceeding when he became cognizant of the defendant’s insanity, holding that the suit could not be prosecuted as long as the insanity continued.

Plaintiff relies upon Iago v. Iago, 168 Ill. 339. In that case the trial court, after appointing a guardian ad litem, heard…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. CassidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Larson v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  3. Iago v. IagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Harrigan v. HarriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Rathbun v. RathbunNew York Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of WellmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rodriguez v. KoschnyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. In Re Marriage of DrewsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Goodman v. GoodmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  5. In Re Estate of WellmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API