Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Nathan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 21, 1956No. Gen. 10,909PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Crow

The plaintiffs, Beulah Sutton Dillon, individually, and Joan Marie Dillon, individually, brought suit October 22,1954 under the Dram Shop Act (Ch. 43, Ill. Rev. Stats., 1953, par. 135) against certain defendant tavern operators for loss of means of support as a result of the fatal shooting on July 17, 1954 of James Dillon, husband and father, respectively, of the two plaintiffs, by one Carl Swenson, an intoxicated person, who allegedly was sold or given alcoholic liquor by the defendants, thereby rendering him intoxicated. All of the defendants answered the complaint. For the present…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Grasse v. Dealer's Transport Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Howlett v. DoglioIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. O'Brien v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Blakeslee's Storage Warehouses, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Prince v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Shelton v. WoolseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  3. Arnold Lies Co. v. LeglerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  4. Gramse v. Royal Crest Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Hayden v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API