State ex rel. Clapp v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Quo warranto.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
This is a proceeding upon information in the nature of quo warranto, to try the right of the above-named respondent, a corporation of the state of New York, to carry on within this state the business of insurance against these three classes of risks, viz., injury or death of persons caused by accident, breach of trust by persons holding places of public or private trust, and the breakage of plate-glass. The case is presented for decision upon the relator’s demurrer to the answer of the respondent.
It is contended on the part of the respondent that this is not an appropriate method of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Christian Union v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- State v. Boston, Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
- People v. Trustees of Geneva CollegeNew York Supreme Court · 1830
3Cited by15 opinions
- People ex rel. Stevens v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. Cates v. Standard Oil Co. of KentuckyTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Childs v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Attorney General ex rel. Wolverine Fish Co. v. A. Booth & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Wright v. LeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.