Zombkowski v. Wisconsin River Power Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
Upon this appeal several claims of error are advanced by the defendant. It is first contended that the plaintiff’s sole remedy was by condemnation under the provisions of ch. 32, Stats. It relies in particular upon the case of Peterson v. Wisconsin River Power Co. 264 Wis. 84, 58 N. W. (2d) 287. That case involved the same defendant and was an action to recover damages to the property of the plaintiff in that case because of seepage of water from the defendant’s dam in the Wisconsin river.
Two matters are called to our attention that were not mentioned in the Peterson Case. First our attention…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ferry v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Perkins v. PeacockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Doyle v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. BillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Muscoda Bridge Co. v. Grant CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Besnah v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Grinley v. Town of Eau GalleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Cordes v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Negus v. Madison Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.