Legal Opinion · Dissent

Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County v. Vahlberg

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 1, 1947No. 31714Published

1DissentHurst, C.J.

I dissent for the following reasons:

1. The rule followed by the majority opinion that a cause will not be considered in this court on a theory not presented in the trial court does not apply to this case, which involves public rights. *532Shaffer Oil & Refining Co. v. County Treasurer, 175 Okla. 6, 52 P. 2d 76; First National Bank v. Southland Production Co., 189 Okla. 9, 112 P. 2d 1087; 3 C. J. 742; 4 C.J.S. 485; 3 Am. Jur. 35.

2. The plaintiff does not point to a statute under which the contract could be made with the architect prior to the accumulation of the fund sufficient to pay for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Henry Shenk Co. v. Erie CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. First Nat. Bank of Alex v. Southland Production Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Hipp v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Krause v. Brd. of Trustees of the School CrothersvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API