Board of Com'rs of Kingfisher County v. Vahlberg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentHurst, C.J.
I dissent for the following reasons:
1. The rule followed by the majority opinion that a cause will not be considered in this court on a theory not presented in the trial court does not apply to this case, which involves public rights. *532Shaffer Oil & Refining Co. v. County Treasurer, 175 Okla. 6, 52 P. 2d 76; First National Bank v. Southland Production Co., 189 Okla. 9, 112 P. 2d 1087; 3 C. J. 742; 4 C.J.S. 485; 3 Am. Jur. 35.
2. The plaintiff does not point to a statute under which the contract could be made with the architect prior to the accumulation of the fund sufficient to pay for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Henry Shenk Co. v. Erie CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- First Nat. Bank of Alex v. Southland Production Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Hipp v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Krause v. Brd. of Trustees of the School CrothersvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.