Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Girard Fire & Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 26, 1940No. 13329PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

We think the questions presented can be fully covered and determined by construing and properly applying to the facts of the case the Code, § 56-825, and the special provisions of the policy. The first ruling of the Court of Appeals complained of is the holding that the conformity clause of the policy relates only to provisions which are in violation of or are prohibited by a statute of the State. Policy provisions in violation of or prohibited by statute are automatically rendered null and void by such statute. Code, § 20-111. The prohibitory statute would as a matter of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. McAlpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Rogers v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. McDaniel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. Atlanta Coach Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Houston v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Imperial Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Imperial Carpet Mills, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Aldridge v. Dixie Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  3. James v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. General Fire & Casualty Co. v. KuffreyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Langley v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API