Legal Opinion · Dissent

R. L. Keeley v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1961No. S. F. 20536Published

1Dissent

SCHAUER, J.,

Dissenting. — The reasoning and conclusions expressed for the District Court of Appeal (when this case was before that court) by Presiding Justice Bray and concurred in by Justices Tobriner and Duniway (as reported in (Cal.App.) 5 Cal.Rptr. 600) in my view typify integrity of the juridical process and benefit clarity of the law. I would adopt that court’s opinion and annul the commission’s award of punitive damages.

I use the phrase “award of punitive damages” advisedly. As pointed out in the opinion of the District Court of Appeal (p. 607 [7, 8] of 5 Cal.Rptr.), “Although the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hawaiian Pineapple Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. City Lincoln-Mercury Co. v. LindseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Parkhurst v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API