Legal Opinion
John Wayne Harris v. Alumax Mill Products, Inc. Andrew Meyers United Steelworkers of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1990No. 88-6434PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Harris appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Alumax Mill Products, Inc. and Myers (collectively Alumax). The district court concluded that Harris’s state law claims were preempted by section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (section 301), and time-barred under the six-month statute of limitations period applicable to section 301 actions of this kind. The district court exercised jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 29 U.S.C. § 185. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Angela Schlacter-Jones v. General Telephone of California Patricia Leathers Carol Todd Doug BartripCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Kalyanaram v. American Ass'n of University Professors at the New York Institute of Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Dolores Sweeney v. Westvaco Company, Dolores Sweeney v. Westvaco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Milne Employees Ass'n v. Sun Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Cesar Galvez v. Carl Kuhn, Anchor Glass, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.