Legal Opinion
Gray v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 8, 2021No. 4:19-cv-04672Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SYDNEY JAE GRAY, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION H-19-4672 § MINNESOTA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court is plaintiff Sydney Jae Gray’s (“Gray”) motion for judgment on the administrative record. Dkt. 25. Defendant Minnesota Life Insurance Company (“Minnesota Life”) responded and requested judgment in its favor. Dkt. 28. Gray replied. Dkt. 30. Minnesota Life also filed a trial brief. Dkt. 26. Gray filed an unopposed motion for oral argument (Dkt. 32) and an…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Kenneth E. Wildbur, Sr. v. Arco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Kenneth SARSHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.