Legal Opinion
Darchuk v. Kellwood Co.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided September 18, 1991No. 88-1392 C (2)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NOCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the motion of defendant Kellwood Company for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
In his complaint plaintiff Walter Dar-chuk alleges violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), *145429 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, and the Employees’ Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1381. It is not disputed that from 1972…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Ed., Island Trees Union Free School Dist. No. 26 v. PicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. BettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. McMannSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Buford v. TremayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.