Legal Opinion

Schaberg v. McDonald

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1900No. 10,957PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Cornish, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

It is contended by the administratrix, plaintiff in error, that the claim against the estate she represents was alloived by the probate court without jurisdiction, and is void because the order of allowance was entered after the time fixed by statute and the order of the court for the presentation of claims against the estate for adjustment and allowance has expired. It is admitted that the claim against the estate was presented and filed in court for allowance within the time limited. The record before us shows, not only the presentation and filing of the claim before the expiration of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Central National Bank v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Greeley v. Provident Savings BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Guaranty State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Houston Nat. Exch. Bank v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. McDonald v. Farley & Loetscher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Hood Ex Rel. United Bank & Trust Co. v. Richardson Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Threadgill v. ColcordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API