Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Hughes v. Gault

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided April 10, 1925No. 124Published

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, District Judge.

When we compare and analyze all the authorities submitted in the very complete briefs of counsel; the only real question in this ease is the sufficiency of the indictment.

If the indictment is sufficient, and the identity of the defendant is admitted or proven, a complete ease for removal is established.

Language is found in the cases which seems to indicate that the defendant is entitled to a hearing upon the merits of the question of guilt or innocence, but this question was very definitely disposed of by the Circuit Court of Appeals in this Eighth Circuit in the recent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. McGrath v. MathuesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Looney v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API