Legal Opinion

Jacobsen v. City of Rathdrum

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1988No. 16901PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is a personal injury case. The primary issue is whether I.C. § 36-1604, Idaho’s recreational use statute (the recreational use statute), precludes a claim on behalf of a two-year old child, who suffered irreparable and irreversible brain damage as the result of nearly drowning in a ditch that runs through the city park in Rathd-rum (the city). The child’s mother asserted claims on behalf of the child premised on the doctrine of attractive nuisance and on the wilful and wanton maintenance by the city of a dangerous condition in the park. We reverse the summary judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Huyck v. Hecla Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Johnson v. Sunshine Min. Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ellis v. Ashton & St. Anthony Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Bicandi v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kuntz v. Lamar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Harris v. State, Dept. of HealthIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Kimberly Ann Sallee, Individually and as Next Friend of Lucas Gregory Durkop and Maria Christina Rivera, Matthew James Sallee, and James Allan Sallee v. Matthew R. Stewart and Diana Stewart D/B/A Stewartland HolsteinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Bauer Ex Rel. Bauer v. Minidoka School District No. 331Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Forbush v. City of LynnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API