Legal Opinion
Davis v. Hults
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The Vehicle and Traffic Law provides that an applicant for a license to operate a motor vehicle or any renewal thereof ‘ ‘ shall furnish such proof of his fitness as the [State] commissioner [of Motor Vehicles] shall in his discretion determine ”. (§ 20, subd. 1, par. a.) It also provides that the Commissioner 11 may refuse to issue or renew a license if he deems the applicant not qualified to receive ” it (subd. 5). And such a license may be revoked by the Commissioner “ because of the conviction of the holder at any time of a felony ’ ’ (§ 71, subd. 3, par. [e]). In any case, the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Pennsylvania v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Tutun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hecht v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. New York Movers Tariff Bureau, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Panzer v. BermanNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Giorgio v. LangNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Valenti v. TofanyNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- Yetta's Rest. Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1965