Legal Opinion

Giorgio v. Lang

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The two petitioners herein are civil service employees, with the title of Assistant Supervisor (Welfare) in the Department of Welfare of the City of New York. They seek promotion to the position of Supervisor (Welfare). The respondents — the Personnel Director of the City of New York and the City Civil Service Commission— duly scheduled an examination for such promotion. The petitioners have instituted this proceeding to cancel the notice for the examination upon the ground that it has been made available to applicants who, under the pertinent laws, are allegedly not eligible. While this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wirzberger v. WatsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Everly v. WeaverNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Chapin v. SchechterNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Davis v. HultsNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Jacob v. SchechterNew York Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walters v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Cave v. KroneNew York Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API