Legal Opinion

E. Regensburg & Sons v. Helvering

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 3, 1942No. 173PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

This cause comes before us upon a petition to review an order of the United States Processing Tax Board of Review, which affirmed an order of the Commissioner denying a petition for the refund of a “processing tax,” levied under the Agricul-" tural Adjustment Act upon the claimant, a manufacturer of cigars. The period during which the tax was levied was between October 1, 1933 and May 31, 1935; the “period before and after the tax,” § 907(b) (2), 7 U.S.C.A. § 649(b) (2), (which we shall call the “base period”), was therefore from October 1, 1932, to October' 1, 1933,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Helvering v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Honorbilt Products, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. Epstein v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Webre Steib Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Cornett-Lewis Coal Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. Cherokee Textile Mills v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  4. Standard Knitting Mills, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  5. Colonial Milling Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API