People v. Gan
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craven
The defendant was convicted of burglary (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 19 — 1) and theft of property having a value of more than *150 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 16 — 1) in a jury trial. He appeals, presenting questions concerning evidentiary rulings and sufficiency of the evidence. He also contends that his sentence of 3 to 9 years’ imprisonment is excessive. We affirm.
On December 14, 1977, an information was filed charging the defendant with burglary and theft of property with a value in excess of *150. Prior to trial, the defendant filed a standard motion for discovery which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- The PEOPLE v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. SavoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- People v. SzerletichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- People v. RiveraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Harley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.