Legal Opinion

People v. Gan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 22, 1979No. 15286PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craven

The defendant was convicted of burglary (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 19 — 1) and theft of property having a value of more than *150 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 16 — 1) in a jury trial. He appeals, presenting questions concerning evidentiary rulings and sufficiency of the evidence. He also contends that his sentence of 3 to 9 years’ imprisonment is excessive. We affirm.

On December 14, 1977, an information was filed charging the defendant with burglary and theft of property with a value in excess of *150. Prior to trial, the defendant filed a standard motion for discovery which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. The PEOPLE v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. SavoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  2. People v. SzerletichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. People v. RiveraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Harley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API