Legal Opinion
Noe v. Ward
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1985No. 84-1090PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is thereby submitted without oral argument.
This is a civil rights action charging religious discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The district court dismissed the complaint and entered judgment for the defendants because of the failure of the plaintiff to comply with the 90-day time limitation as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers, Local Union No. 135 v. Jefferson Trucking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Edward Saffron v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Carlile v. South Routt School District RE 3-JCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Robert M. GONZALEZ, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANFORD APPLIED ENGINEERING, INC., Et Al., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jessie Berger v. Iron Workers Reinforced Rodmen Local 201, International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron WorkersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Tedder R. Million v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Mosley v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Griffin v. Prince William Hospital Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- Lazaro E. Flores v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.