Legal Opinion
Tenneco, Inc. And Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 14, 1982No. 81-4049PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge:
This matter started when Tenneco Inc. petitioned the Federal Power Commission (FPC) for a declaratory order validating certain natural gas transactions. The FPC’s successor, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“the Commission”) eventually dismissed Tenneco’s petition, but ordered its newly formed Office of Enforcement to continue investigating all matters raised in the petition. Tenneco filed a petition for review of the dismissal order in this court. Because we conclude that Tenneco is not an “aggrieved” party as that term is used in Section 19(b) of the Natural Gas…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ecee, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Pennzoil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Public Utilities Commission Of The State Of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Southwest Gas Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of Nevada, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Public Utilities Commission of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.