Legal Opinion
Camozzi v. Roland/Miller & Hope Consulting Group
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1989No. Nos. 87-2554, 87-2579PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
James Camozzi and Gary Lessnau were injured during construction of a United States Post Office in Petaluma, California. Both sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). Summary judgment was granted in favor of the United States on the ground that USPS’s alleged negligence occurred in the performance of a discretionary function.1 See 28 *288U.S.C. § 2680(a).2 We reverse.
The United States Postal Service (USPS) contracted with the Roland/Miller Associates and Hope Consulting Group (Roland/Miller) to supervise the construction of the Petaluma…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- In Re Consolidated United States Atmospheric Testing Litigation, Christina Konizeski v. Livermore Labs, Alice P. Broudy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Guile v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Kendra Summers, a Minor, and Frederick J. Summers, Guardian Ad Litem v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Garcia Ex Rel. Estate of Garcia v. United States Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Marlys Bear Medicine v. United States ex rel. Secretary of the Department of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.