Legal Opinion

Warring v. Keeler

New York County Courts

Decided February 15, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from justice court. Action by Eleazar Warring against John B. Keeler. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The plaintiff and respondent on the 15th day of August, 1894, applied to L. W. Bailey, a justice of the peace of the town of Veteran in this county, for a summons against the defendant. . The justice issued said summons, and made it returnable on the 23d day of August, at 10 o’clock in the forenoon. On the back of the summons he put the following indorsement: “Eleazar Warring is hereby authorized to seme this precept. L. W. Bailey, Justice.” On the 1st day of August the plaintiff served the summons and made the usual return. The plaintiff was not a constable. The defendant did not appear, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Putnam v. ManNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Fitch v. DevlinNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Wheeler v. LampmanNew York Supreme Court · 1817
  4. Sherwood v. Saratoga & Washington RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Sperry v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nevada Cornell Silver Mines, Inc. v. HankinsNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Smith v. Burliss, New York County Courts1898
  3. Decker v. Ekelman, New York County Courts1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API