Legal Opinion

King v. Ainsworth

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1955No. 39776PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillespie, J.

This is a replevin suit wherein appellee, plaintiff below, obtained judgment for the possession of an automobile theretofore sold by appellee to appellant under a conditional sales contract, the terms of which were allegedly breached by non-payment of the last six installments.

Appellant contends that the venue of the suit was not in Smith County because no proof was offered that the automobile was found in Smith County or that appellant was found in Smith County. We think the record is sufficient both as to the property and as to the person, either of which, if found in the county, permits…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grenada Auto Co. v. WaldropMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Stanley v. CruiseMississippi Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. John H. Freeman, Jr., D/B/A Freeman Electric Gin Company v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Hohlstein v. HohlsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Belk v. State Dept. of Public WelfareMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Wofford v. CITIES SERVICE OIL COMPANYMississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Gillard v. Great Southern Mtg. & Loan Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API