Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Cruise

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1924No. 23759PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSykes, P. J.

The appellees who are complainants in the chancery court seek in their bill to have declared null and void two judgments in replevin'rendered against them, and to have perpetually enjoined the issuance of execution upon these two judgments. The grounds set up in the bill are, briefly stated, that neither the defendant Cruise in the replevin suits, nor the mules replevied, were in the supervisors’ district of the justice of the peace who issued the process and tried the causes.

The bill further sets up a meritorious defense to thereplevin suits. A temporary injunction was issued by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Catlett v. DrummondMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Lewis v. SinclairMississippi Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McKinley Brown, Etc. v. T. A. Vance, Etc., Mary Jean Boone, Etc., Cross-Appellee v. Walter L. Dennis, Etc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. King v. AinsworthMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Ravesies v. MartinMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Fitzgerald v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Henderson v. GranthamMississippi Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API