Legal Opinion

Quest v. East Omaha Drainage District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1952No. 33087PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This is an action for damages, allegedly caused to plaintiff’s real estate, by reason of an excavation made by defendant on its land, adjoining that of the plaintiff. Issues were made and trial was had. At the close of all the evidence, on motion of defendant, the trial court discharged the jury and dismissed the action. Plaintiff appeals. We reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause.

It was stipulated that the defendant was a corporation organized and existing under the provisions of Chapter 31, article 4, R. S. 1943. As such it had the power of eminent domain. § 31-415, R.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Omaha v. KramerNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Snyder v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Wagner v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Weisenmiller v. NestorNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Luchsinger v. Loup River Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Petition of Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Pieper v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Armbruster v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Phillips Petroleum Company v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Armbruster v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API