Legal Opinion
Yarborough v. Montgomery
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided April 17, 2008No. Civil Action 3:07-1257-CMCPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff has responded in opposition to the motions. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motions are granted and this matter is dismissed with prejudice.
Standard of Review
Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lathan v. Greenville, City ofDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
- McCree v. Chester, City ofDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
- Patrick v. Aiken, City ofDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- Stone v. GlassDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
- Travis Tyrone Petty v. Dep. Branson, Dep. Hendrich, Dep. J. Macklin, Dep. T. Shue, Dep. BennettDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.