People v. Holmes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 to set aside so much of his sentence as imposed consecutive terms of imprisonment upon his two convictions of murder in the second degree (see Penal Law § 125.25 [1]). The challenged consecutive sentences were imposed pursuant to the statutory sentencing scheme that requires concurrent sentences to be imposed “[w]hen more than one sentence of imprisonment is imposed on a person for two or more offenses committed through a single act or omission, or through an act or omission which in itself constituted one of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- People v. LaureanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. BrathwaiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. MoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. Jingzhi LiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. MunnerlynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.