Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1973No. 7322DC347Published

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant’s assignments of error directed against the charge are well taken.

Plaintiff alleged and offered evidence tending to show that she left the home because of the indignities heaped upon her person by defendant. It was also necessary for her to satisfy the jury that such acts by her husband were not the result of adequate provocation on her part. The judge’s failure to so instruct the jury constituted prejudicial error and requires a new trial. Howell v. Howell, 223 N.C. 62, 25 S.E. 2d 169; Barker v. Barker, 232 N.C. 495, 61 S.E. 2d 360. The relative fault of the parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dowdy v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Howell v. . HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Barker v. BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API