Howell v. . Howell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.
In an action for alimony without divorce, as in an action for divorce a mensa et thoro by the wife, she must not only set out with some particularity the acts of cruelty upon the part of the husband, but she must aver, and consequently offer proof, that such acts were without adequate provocation upon her part. Pollard v. Pollard, 221 N. C., 46, 19 S. E. (2d), 1; Carnes v. Carnes, 204 N. C., 636, 169 S. E., 222; Dowdy v. Dowdy, 154 N. C., 556, 70 S. E., 719; Martin v. Martin, 130 N. C., 27, 40 S. E., 822; O’Connor v. O’Connor, 109 N. C., 139, 13 S. E., 887; Jackson v. Jackson, 105 N. C., 433,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. Martin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Jackson v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Dowdy v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- White v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Augir v. WarderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brooks v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Best v. . BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Pearce v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Ollis v. OllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.