Rosin v. MONKEN
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
After he was required to register as a sex offender in Illinois, Mitchell Rosin brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the defendants failed to give full faith and credit to the March 27, 2003 judgment of a New York court. In that order, the court accepted a plea agreement that did not require Rosin to register as a sex offender in New York. He contends that Illinois is constitutionally required to give effect to the New York judgment and thus cannot, on the basis of that order, force him to register as a sex offender within its jurisdiction. The district…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Bigelow v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- DeGuelle v. CamilliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Adar v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Henry v. HimesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Bart Dalton v. Carol DaltonTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- Independents Gas & Service Stations Ass'n v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.