Gillette v. Hodge
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District, of Minnesota.
1Opinion of the Court
AM1DON, District Judge.
This was an action brought by Hodge Bros., the defendants in error, against the plaintiff's in error, on three promissory notes, dated April 13, 1903, payable to Robert Burgess & Son, or order, respectively, July 1, 1904, 1905, and 1900, willi’in-terest payable annually. The notes contained a provision that default in the payment of interest should cause the whole note to become immediately' due. The plaintiffs are private bankers, who discounted the notes at the rate of 10 per cent, on June 2, 1904, passing the proceeds to the credit of the payees, who afterwards drew…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Keene Five Cent Sav. Bank v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Hodge v. WallaceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Crissey v. MorrillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nickell v. BradshawOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Putthoff v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
- Barbour v. FinkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Chase Nat. Bank v. BurgDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1940
- United States v. SchaefferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.