Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. W. P.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 2009No. CC 07201J; CA A136056; SC S055687PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBalmoer, J.
We allowed review in this case to consider whether the exclusionary rule, under which illegally obtained evidence is excluded from certain court proceedings, applies to a parent’s motion to suppress evidence in a juvenile dependency proceeding involving the parent’s child. The juvenile court determined that it does not and therefore denied a motion to suppress filed by child’s father. The court then found child to be within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court and placed child in the custody of the Department of Human Services (DHS). Father appealed, arguing that the court had erred in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Department of Human Services v. J. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. M. A. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Dept. of Human Services v. T. G. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Department of Human Services v. J. L. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.