Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wyandotte County Sheriff's Department

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 22, 1997No. Civil Action 96-2205-GTVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN BEBBER, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action asserting claims of sex discrimination, race discrimination, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and a claim of age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 18). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.

I. Factual Background 1

The following facts are either uncontroverted or are based on evidence…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fugate v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas CityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  2. Arceo v. City of Junction City, KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  3. Rawlins-Roa v. United Way of Wyandotte County, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  4. Whane v. State of Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  5. Whayne v. StateDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API