Boam v. Sewell
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
— Judgment entered on a verdict December 28, 1922, in favor of respondents was vacated by order of the trial judge March 22, 1923. An appeal taken from that order, Boam v. Sewell, 40 Ida. 524, 234 Pac. 153, was not on the merits of the case, but involved solely the order vacating the judgment, wherein this court held as a matter of procedure under the statute that the original judgment could not be vacated in the manner in which it was, and that the same should be reinstated. The remittitur was filed in the district court on March 25, 1925, and pursuant to the directions therein the clerk of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Miller v. ProutIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Hester v. BaskinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Boam v. SewellIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Jones & Co. v. C. W. Hancock & SonsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baldwin v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Mountain States Implement Co. v. AraveIdaho Supreme Court · 1931