Legal Opinion

Acme Food Co. v. Kirsch

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1911No. Docket No. 14PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Manistee; Withey, J. Assumpsit by the Acme Food Company, a foreign corporation, against R. G. Kirsch and E. O. Thompson on a foreign judgment. On the trial before the court without a jury judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Plaintiff is an Illinois corporation. The defendants are residents of Manistee county, Mich. A judgment was obtained by plaintiff in the municipal court of the city of Chicago against defendants, July 13, 1907, upon a warrant of attorney contained in the following instrument:

*434“$250.00.
“Grand Rapids, Mich., March 9, 1905.
“ On or before eighteen months after date, for value received, I, we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of Acme Food Company, a corporation organized and ex-t isting under the laws of the State of Illinois, two hundred* and fifty and no/100 dollars, payable at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. GarlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Trombly v. ParsonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. W. H. Barber Co. v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Ohio Ex Rel. Superintendent of Banks v. EubankMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Jones v. TurnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Egley v. T. B. Bennett & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Paulausky v. Polish Roman Catholic UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API