Legal Opinion

Williams v. Hugunin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding. This was a bill in equity, by Hiram L. Hugunin against Mary C. Williams, to subject her separate estate to the payment of a note of her husband, which she had indorsed. The opinion of the court states the facts of the case.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This bill was to subject the separate estate of a married "woman to the payment of a debt which, it is alleged, was, by implication, charged upon it.

It is alleged, in substance, the husband of appellant executed the note in controversy, payable to the order of appellee, upon which appellant indorsed her name before its delivery; that she had separate property over which she exercised the powers of a feme sole; that the note was executed and indorsed with the intention of charging it upon such separate estate. Appellant admits she has separate property; that she indorsed the note substantially…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yale v. . DedererNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Cookson v. TooleIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Carpenter v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Furness v. McGovernIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Adam v. RockeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  3. Forbes v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1883
  4. Ferdon v. MillerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1881
  5. Roberts v. JenksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API