Legal Opinion

Ferdon v. Miller

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1881Published

Bill to foreclose. On final hearing on pleadings and proofs..

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

In March, 1875, Christopher R. Miller and John Ferdon en*11terecl into copartnership in business, in Yew York. It was agreed between them that each should contribute half of the capital, which was to be $3,000. Miller not having the money to contribute his share, it was agreed between thorn that he and' his wife should give Ferdon their bond, secured by mortgage on property in Jersey City, the title to which was in Mrs. Miller, to secure payment of $1,500, to enable Ferdon to raise it. The bond and mortgage were given accordingly, and Ferdon having raised the money on his note for…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Bank v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. William & Mary College v. PowellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1855
  3. Radford v. CarwileWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Burnett v. Hawpe's ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1874
  5. Campbell & Jones v. MurraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API