Legal Opinion

Mohr v. Mohr

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1939No. Civ. 10577PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is an appeal by defendant, George L. Mohr, upon the judgment roll, from that portion of the judgment in the above-entitled action by which plaintiff was awarded $100 per month for her support. Said defendant also appeals from an order awarding plaintiff the sum of $1,100 as counsel fees.

By her amended complaint, plaintiff sought a divorce from defendant George L. Mohr and also sought to quiet title to certain property as against defendant Frank Mohr. Defendant George L. Mohr filed an answer and cross-complaint and defendant Frank Mohr filed an answer. The judgment determined the property…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hardy v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hagle v. HagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Volkmar v. VolkmarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Sweasey v. SweaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Broad v. BroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mueller v. MuellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hager v. HagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Fitzsimmons v. FitzsimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API