State v. Clark
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Price, J.:
This is an appeal by the State from an order granting defendant a new trial following his conviction of grand larceny.
The defendant was charged with the larceny of a hat and topcoat alleged to be of the value of $60. We are told that the jury found the property to be of the value of $35. Following his conviction defendant filed a motion for a new trial, alleging four grounds — (1) the admission of illegal and improper testimony over his objections; (2) the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence; (3) insufficiency of the State’s evidence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MarekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- State v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GrimesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- State v. HessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
- State v. KidwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- State v. RamirezSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.