Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1951No. 38,492PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This is an appeal by the State from an order granting defendant a new trial following his conviction of grand larceny.

The defendant was charged with the larceny of a hat and topcoat alleged to be of the value of $60. We are told that the jury found the property to be of the value of $35. Following his conviction defendant filed a motion for a new trial, alleging four grounds — (1) the admission of illegal and improper testimony over his objections; (2) the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence; (3) insufficiency of the State’s evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MarekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. State v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GrimesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  2. State v. HessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  3. State v. KidwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. State v. RamirezSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API