Legal Opinion

Bjorklund v. Golub Corpp

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 25, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01271Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT GAIL BJORKLUND, Plaintiff, No. 3:18cv1271 (MPS) v. THE GOLUB CORPORATION, Defendant. RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff Gail Bjorklund alleges that her former employer, the Golub Corporation ("Golub"), discriminated against her on the basis of sex and age in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act,

29 U.S.C. §§ 621

et seq. Defendant Golub moves for summary judgment. (ECF No. 21.) For the reasons discussed below, the motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API