Legal Opinion
Caro v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF AUSTIN
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 19, 1990No. 3-89-204-CVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POWERS, Justice.
The Housing Authority of the City of Austin recovered judgment for possession and past-due rentals in a forcible-detainer action against Dandra Caro. Caro appeals. We will affirm the trial-court judgment.
THE CONTROVERSY
Caro resides in a low-income housing facility owned and operated by the Authority. The facility is subsidized by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. In consequence, the Authority is required by the terms of an annual “Contributions Contract” to adhere to the United States Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. § 1437 et seq. (1978 &…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Durham CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jack v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
- National Life & Accident Insurance v. DoveTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- McVea v. VerkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McGruder v. WillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Moon v. Spring Creek ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Beach Street Foods, Inc., Khalida Saleemi, Jawaid Alam, and Umme Alam v. Grandy's, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2022
- Elizabeth Perry v. Wichita Falls Housing Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2022
- Geneva Colbert v. Langwick Senior Residences, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.