Legal Opinion

People v. Bell

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herbert A. Posner, J.

THE ISSUE

In this motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence, the court was confronted with a novel issue after it conducted a hearing (see, People v Stokes, 83 AD2d 968) and learned that the newly discovered evidence posed the same dilemma as was immortalized by Shakespeare in Hamlet’s famous soliloquy, “To be or not to be.” In this case the question was: Is this evidence to be admissible at a new trial or is it not to be admissible at a new trial? If it is admissible it could very well result in an acquittal on one (felony murder) of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. People Ex Rel. Taylor v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. People v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Highbaugh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Highbaugh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API