Highbaugh v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1DissentBoehm, Justice
I concur in parts I, II, and III of the majority opinion, but dissent as to part IV of the opinion. As the majority points out, in Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314, 326, 119 S.Ct. 1307, 143 L.Ed.2d 424 (1999), the United States Supreme Court held that the privilege against self-incrimination contained in the Fifth Amendment exists until the possibility of further incrimination ceases, i.e., when “the sentence has been fixed and the judgment of conviction has become final.” The Supreme Court in Mitchell did not define the point at which a judgment of conviction becomes final for Fifth…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Raymond Lee Mills v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Guy Joseph DuchiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Ellison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Knight v. MaybeeNew York Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.