Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Berg

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1903No. 2224PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court- of Boulder County.

1Opinion of the CourtGunter, J.

General demurrer to complaint sustained. Prom judgment of dismissal plaintiff appeals.

The complaint alleges that April 19, 1893, Frank A. Berg was the owner of lots 10, 11 and 12, block 4, Rose Hill Addition to the city of Boulder; that said date he gave a trust deed thereon to secure the payment of a promissory note of $300, payable to one Harlow; that July 15,1893, he deeded said lots — without consideration — to his wife, Anna Berg; that Jan-*342nary 22, 1894, said Frank A. Berg and Anna Berg made a trust deed on said'lots securing the payment of a promissory note of $249, payable to Frank…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dewey v. Schreiber Implement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Wittman v. PickensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Flynn v. CasperColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Flynn v. CasperColorado Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API