People v. Bailey
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtLavin, J.
*141*378INTRODUCTION
Under the California Constitution, a criminal defendant has the right to a unanimous jury verdict. The jury in this case returned verdict forms finding defendant Christopher Bailey guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol (count 1) and driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent or more (count 2)-but when the trial court polled the jury, one juror replied that she did not find defendant guilty of count 1. Notwithstanding the lack of a *379unanimous verdict on count 1, the court recorded guilty verdicts for both counts and discharged the jury.
Defendant contends…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Escarcega, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Babbitt CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. EscarcegaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019