Legal Opinion

People v. Bailey

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided September 20, 2018No. B275818PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavin, J.

*141*378INTRODUCTION

Under the California Constitution, a criminal defendant has the right to a unanimous jury verdict. The jury in this case returned verdict forms finding defendant Christopher Bailey guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol (count 1) and driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.08 percent or more (count 2)-but when the trial court polled the jury, one juror replied that she did not find defendant guilty of count 1. Notwithstanding the lack of a *379unanimous verdict on count 1, the court recorded guilty verdicts for both counts and discharged the jury.

Defendant contends…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Escarcega, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. People v. Babbitt CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. People v. EscarcegaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API