Legal Opinion

People v. Escarcega

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 20, 2019No. B284215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavin, Acting P. J.

*773*365INTRODUCTION

Defendant Marco Escarcega caused a head-on collision while attempting to pass two vehicles on a two-lane road at night, resulting in catastrophic injuries to two victims. Defendant argues that there is insufficient evidence he acted with wanton disregard for safety; that he was denied his right to present a defense when the court excluded cross-examination questions about other accidents on that stretch of road; that the great-bodily-injury enhancement is unauthorized because great bodily injury is an element of the underlying offense; that the evidence did not support the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BarberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. People v. SerranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. People v. TanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. People v. TarkingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API