People v. Escarcega
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtLavin, Acting P. J.
*773*365INTRODUCTION
Defendant Marco Escarcega caused a head-on collision while attempting to pass two vehicles on a two-lane road at night, resulting in catastrophic injuries to two victims. Defendant argues that there is insufficient evidence he acted with wanton disregard for safety; that he was denied his right to present a defense when the court excluded cross-examination questions about other accidents on that stretch of road; that the great-bodily-injury enhancement is unauthorized because great bodily injury is an element of the underlying offense; that the evidence did not support the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BarberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. SerranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- People v. TanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. TarkingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020